Conversation
|
Model not found: cloudflare-ai-gateway/anthropic/claude-opus-4-7. Did you mean: anthropic/claude-opus-4.5, anthropic/claude-opus-4.6, anthropic/claude-opus-4.7? |
|
@gabivlj Bonk workflow failed. Check the logs for details. View workflow run · To retry, trigger Bonk again. |
commit: |
|
Model not found: cloudflare-ai-gateway/anthropic/claude-opus-4-7. Did you mean: anthropic/claude-opus-4.5, anthropic/claude-opus-4.6, anthropic/claude-opus-4.7? |
8d8332f to
a37865f
Compare
|
I'm Bonk, and I've done a quick review of your PR. Guards Findings (2 posted as inline suggestions):
Not posted inline:
The alarm early-return at |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Guards alarm() / syncPendingStoppedEvents() against an in-flight start, and makes getState() repair a stale stopped state when ctx.container.running is true.
Two inline findings posted. Repo-hygiene issues that can't take an inline comment:
examples/egress-interception/container_src/serveris a committed 8.8 MB compiled Go binary (ELF 64-bit LSB executable, ... with debug_info, not stripped).examples/egress-interception/Dockerfilealready builds this frommain.goinside the image, so the artifact is unused and unrelated to this PR. Once merged it lives in git history forever. Please drop it from the commit and add an ignore entry (e.g.examples/*/container_src/server) to.gitignore.examples/basic/pnpm-lock.yaml(+872) looks accidental. Every example in this repo is npm-locked (examples/*/package-lock.json), andexamples/basicalready has one — this adds a second, conflicting lockfile for a different package manager. Unless the repo is intentionally switching to pnpm, drop it.npx prettier --check src/tests/container.test.tsfails on the two new tests, which will fail the format CI job.
Changeset is present and patch is the right bump. Unit tests pass (27/27).
|
I'm Bonk, and I've done a quick review of your PR. Guards Findings (2 posted as inline comments, 1 with a suggestion):
Not posted inline (no reviewable line):
Changeset is present and |
|
I'm Bonk, and I've done a quick review of your PR. The force-push to Findings (none posted inline — no reviewable line for #1, and #2/#3 are already published on this PR):
Unit tests pass (27/27) on this commit. |
|
I'm Bonk, and I've done a quick review of your PR. Guards 1 new finding posted inline ( Status of previously published findings on this commit — both still apply unchanged, details in review
Resolved since the last review: the changeset is back ( Unit tests pass (27/27). |
|
I'm Bonk, and I've done a quick review of your PR. Guards No new findings on Status of previously published findings — all three still apply unchanged:
Verification on this commit: |
|
I'm Bonk, and I've done a quick review of your PR. Guards 1 new finding posted inline ( Status of previously published findings — both still apply unchanged on
Resolved since the last review: the detached-monitor gap from review Verification on this commit: |
…ss with ctx.container
|
I'm Bonk, and I've done a quick review of your PR. Guards No new findings on Status of previously published findings — both still apply unchanged:
Verification on this commit: |
|
After some investigation, I think its a fair trade-off. If there is an inflight start and we haven't been able to call onStop, it feels like a fair trade-off as we would get into recursive onStop territory here (onStop calls start(), etc). |
No description provided.